Search for: "Parker v. Social Security"
Results 1 - 20
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
In Parker-Grose v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 9:46 am
At least in certain social security cases.The case is Fields v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
Parker for Lamon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:18 am
The Court of Appeals has reversed the findings of the Social Security Administration and found that a woman is entitled to Supplemental Security Income because she is in fact disabled and cannot work a full range of jobs.The case is Rucker v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
Parker for Lamon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
” In Parker v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 6:19 am
Older and injured at work workers in Kentucky recently received a major win from the Kentucky Supreme Court in Parker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:09 am
by Norma Coe, Kelly Haverstick, Alicia Munnell, and Anthony Webb Severe Impairment in Social Security Disability Cases - Parker-Grose v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am
You take a worthwhile social goal – protecting domestic partners from abuse – and then you contort the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Section 3715, Providing Home and Community-Based Services in Acute Care Hospitals: A number of waivers under sections 1915 and 1115 of the Social Security Act provide for home and community-based services for individuals who otherwise would require care in a hospital, nursing facility, or ICF/MR. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
Parker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 8:39 am
Answer: The face-to-face encounter, as described at 1814(a)(2)(C) and 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act, can be performed via telehealth in accordance with the requirements under 1834(m)(4)(C) of the Social Security Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:20 am
At the end of the spring 2004 semester, Saravia received an email in one of his UH accounts from an unknown Yahoo account, which contained his social security number. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
Permissive exclusion actions are covered in §1128(b)(1)–§1128(b)(16) and §1156 of the Social Security Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
"The case is Robinson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
This happened when the authorities were actually investigating him for alleged theft of social security funds. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
The anatomy of a disputed claim for GML §207-c benefitsParker v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 50957(U), Decided on May 26, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Ferris D. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:16 am
Further, David, unlike Bright-Asante, did not allow the customer to access the Saks register to input her Social Security number and email address; did not use her cell phone during the transactions; and did not take an unusually long time to process her transactions. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:23 am
The case cannot proceed in court because of an arbitration clause.The case is Parisi v. [read post]
